SA Reserve Bank slaps Old Mutual Life with R15.9 million penalty due to non-compliance with FICA

The South African Reserve Bank has imposed administrative sanctions on Old Mutual Life Assurance Company Limited due to non-compliance. Picture: Karen Sandison/Independent Newspapers

The South African Reserve Bank has imposed administrative sanctions on Old Mutual Life Assurance Company Limited due to non-compliance. Picture: Karen Sandison/Independent Newspapers

Published 4h ago

Share

The South African Reserve Bank (Sarb) has imposed administrative sanctions on Old Mutual Life Assurance Company Limited (OMLACSA).

The Sarb has imposed administrative sanctions on OMLACSA due to their non-compliance with the provisions of the Financial Intelligence Centre Act 38 of 2001 (FIC Act), after a FIC Act inspection was conducted in 2020.

Sarb said that the Prudential Authority (PA) which operates within the administration of the Sarb, is mandated to supervise and enforce compliance by accountable institutions with the provisions of the FIC Act or any order, determination or directive made in terms thereof.

According to Sarb, the administrative sanctions consist of four cautions and a financial penalty that totals R15.9 million, of which R5.9 million is conditionally suspended for 36 months as from July 23, 2024.

Sarb said that the administrative sanctions imposed on OMLACSA are from the following non-compliance:

– OMLACSA failed to comply with its customer due diligence (CDD) obligations in terms of sections 21 and/or 21A to 21H of the FIC Act in that it failed to conduct CDD on sampled active customer relationships.

“The non-compliance inter alia included failures to verify the physical address of clients and identify the beneficial owners of clients,” Sarb said.

“The PA imposed a caution not to repeat the conduct which led to the non-compliance and a financial penalty of R6 million, of which R2 million is conditionally suspended for a period of 36 months.”

– OMLACSA failed to comply with its cash threshold reporting (CTR) obligations in terms of section 28 of the FIC Act, read with FIC Act Regulations 22B, 22C and 24(4). They failed to timeously report cash transactions above the prescribed limit to the Financial Intelligence Centre (FIC).

The PA imposed a caution not to repeat the conduct which led to the non-compliance and a financial penalty of R4.9 millio. Of the R4.9 million penalty, R1.9 million is conditionally suspended for 36 months.

– OMLACSA failed to timeously report on suspicious and unusual transactions to the FIC in compliance with its suspicious and unusual transaction reporting (STR) obligations in terms of section 29 of the FIC Act, read with FIC Act Regulation 24(3).

According to Sarb, the PA imposed a caution not to repeat the conduct which led to the non-compliance.

– OMLACSA failed to comply with section 42 of the FIC Act in that it failed to adequately develop and implement its Risk Management and Compliance Programme (RMCP).

The Reserve Bank said Old Mutual failed to:

– identify, assess and monitor its money laundering, terrorist financing and proliferation financing (ML/TF/PF) risks.

– adequately risk rate clients before onboarding;

– evidence that the ML/TF risk rating methodology is applied consistently;

– implement its secondary ML/TF risk indicators;

– evidence that it had documented its consideration of local geographical location risks; and

– adequately implement anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) obligations and controls in relation to its CDD, CTR and STR obligations.

Sarb said: “The PA imposed a caution not to repeat the conduct which led to the non-compliance and a financial penalty of R5 million, of which R2 million is conditionally suspended for a period of 36 months.”

The PA confirmed that the OMLACSA cooperated with the PA throughout the process and has undertaken the necessary remedial action to address all the identified compliance deficiencies and control weaknesses.

IOL Business